Factory-direct seating manufacturer  ·  MOQ from 6 pcs · Samples in 7 days · OEM / ODM welcome
Commercial Restaurant Chairs

How AQL sampling works on a real chair order

AQL appears on every quotation and is understood by almost nobody. It is a sampling plan, not a promise, and the number you agree decides how many faulty chairs you have already paid for.

Published by JPChairs · Chair manufacturer in Foshan, China · 2026-10-14

What AQL does and does not tell you

AQL — acceptable quality limit — is a statistical sampling plan drawn from ISO 2859-1, the same tables published as ANSI/ASQ Z1.4. It answers one narrow question: on the evidence of this random sample, is the whole lot likely to sit at or below the defect rate we agreed?

Three inputs set the plan. Lot size produces a code letter. Inspection level is almost always General Inspection Level II for furniture. The AQL number is the defect rate you tolerate, expressed as a percentage.

What AQL does not tell you is whether the chair is well engineered. A lot can pass at 2.5 and still loosen after six months because the joint design is weak. Sampling measures consistency, not design.

Sample sizes for real order quantities

At General Inspection Level II, single sampling, normal inspection:

So a 500-chair order is judged on 50 chairs. A plan that accepts 3 defects out of 50 is not a plan that delivers a clean container, which is why the number matters more than the word "inspected" on the quotation.

Tightening to AQL 1.0 on that same 50-piece sample drops the accept number to 1 and reject to 2, at no extra inspection time.

Critical, major, minor

Defects are graded, and each grade carries its own AQL:

Writing the grading into the contract matters more than the AQL number itself. "AQL 2.5" with no definitions is an argument waiting for a container to arrive. The ranges we ship against, with the specifications each one is built to, are listed in the restaurant chair specifications.

Tolerances worth writing down

These six lines remove most of the subjectivity from a final inspection:

The sealed reference sample is the anchor. Keep one at the factory and one with you; every dispute resolves against it.

Who inspects, and when

Three checkpoints are worth the fee:

Final inspection alone is the weakest option. It tells you the container is bad at the exact point where the only remaining remedy is rework in your own warehouse.

When a lot fails

Three outcomes, in order of cost. The factory reworks the lot and reinspects, which adds 3 to 10 days. Or the lot is sorted 100 per cent and only sound units ship, adding 1 to 3 days plus sorting labour. Or you accept it against a credit note — the option to avoid where a structural fault is involved.

Agree in advance who pays the second inspection fee: normally the factory on a clear failure, the buyer on a borderline result. Also state whether reinspection runs at normal or tightened inspection. After one rejection the standard plan moves to tightened automatically, which raises the sample size and lowers the accept number.

To see how frames are built and checked before they are packed, start with the factory production lines; the shipping questions that follow inspection are answered on the shipping FAQ.

Questions buyers ask

FAQ

What AQL should I specify for restaurant chairs?

AQL 0 for critical defects, 2.5 for major and 4.0 for minor is the industry default. For a first order from a new supplier, tighten major to 1.0: on a 50-piece sample that means accepting 1 defect instead of 3.

How many chairs are inspected on a 500-piece order?

50 pieces, at General Inspection Level II code letter H. At AQL 2.5 the lot passes with up to 3 major defects and fails on 4. Moving to AQL 1.0 lowers the accept number to 1.

Who pays when a container fails inspection?

The factory usually covers rework and the reinspection fee when the failure is unambiguous; borderline results generally land with the buyer. Define each defect class in writing before the deposit so the outcome is not decided by negotiation.